Required inputs
Dated AR ledger, receipts, adjustments, prior snapshot, aging definitions and approved follow-up policy.
Daily / D2
Collections Exceptions
Which balances need a closer look today?
D2 / Daily / Product design
A clear scope.
A useful output.
Review new balances, receipts and aging exceptions before preparing the day's follow-up list.
Review output
A reconciled balance-change queue with evidence and unresolved ledger items.
The human decision
Confirm the ledger discrepancy and choose an authorized follow-up. No notices are sent.
Dependencies before conclusions
Make the gaps visible.
Upstream
What comes first.
OS dated AR source pack
Required dependency
What must be accepted.
Opening/closing ledger; charges, receipts and adjustments; aging definitions; approved follow-up policy
If an input is missing
What stays open.
Balance change remains unavailable when either date or reconciliation inputs are missing.
Required dependency identified; source availability and reviewer acceptance not yet confirmed. Core is separate Consulting; OS contains the data/context foundation.
Separate fictional scenario
Show the evidence.
Bound the conclusion.
This illustration is specific to this workflow. Its properties, ledger figures and assumptions are not joined to the Morning Portfolio Review or other examples.
Illustration
Invented October 2 AR is 17,000 after receipts of 1,000 against the October 1 balance of 18,000, with no new charges or adjustments in this illustration.
What a reviewer should check
18,000 − 1,000 = 17,000; show the two dates, zero-adjustment assumption and any missing ledger rows.
Start with one useful review
Bring the question.
And the context.
Show us the property, the inputs your team has and the decision the review needs to support. We can discuss fit and a scoped pilot.
Book a demo